The Final Moments of 9/11 Photographer, Bill Biggart

*I originally published the following article on Petapixel on September 11th, 2020, it is reproduced here in honor of the 20th anniversary

“With a press pass around his neck and a camera bag over his shoulder, in the middle of a crossfire – Bill was in heaven.”  —Wendy Doremus

September 11, 2001 was a sunny Tuesday morning.  Bill Biggart and his wife Wendy Doremus were walking their dogs in downtown Manhattan.  At about 8:45am, the couple noticed clouds of grey smoke forming against the clear blue New York City skyline.  A passing taxi driver informed the couple that an airplane had crashed into the World Trade Center.

Biggart, a seasoned press photographer, cut the serene walk short and quickly returned to his Union Square apartment.  He gathered his Canon D30, two Canon EOS-1n’s, Domke camera bag and six rolls of Fuji Sensia 35mm slide film.

The $3,000, 3.1 megapixel prosumer D30 had just been released in 2000 and was Biggart’s first DSLR.  His EOS-1n 35mm SLR’s were among the last professional film cameras that Canon would make but Biggart had been turning out important news images with them since the mid 1990’s — and shooting in general, since the 1970’s.

Biggart began his two mile, twenty block trek toward the destruction from which everyone around him was fleeing.  He shot film and digital images, cameras swinging from his shoulders, as he approached the unfolding scene.

For years, Biggart denounced color and then digital photography, working exclusively in 35mm b&w.  Eventually, he saw that the news was going digital so he took up the new technology and switched to color film to match.

At 9:03 am, while still en route, Biggart observed a commercial airplane slamming into the South Tower.  He lifted the D30 to his eye.  Likely with his 80-200mm lens, he captured a brilliant orange and red fireball exploding out of the second tower.

Bill Biggart had moved to New York City in the early 1970’s, when the World Trade Center opened.  He witnessed its construction and now he watched as the South Tower burned like a torch.

This was the moment when the same poignant thought crossed the minds of all Americans who were able to tune into television news that day.  Two plane crashes in the same spot, on the same day – this couldn’t have been an accident.  But Biggart knew that whatever was going on, it needed to be photographed.

Biggart drew closer and closer until his shots of the towers were near fully vertical.  Emergency rescue workers and even other photojournalists cautioned that he was getting too close.  At 9:59 a.m., Biggart captured the South Tower disintegrating as it came crashing down, blanketing him and his Canons in dust and debris.  Shrugging it off, he continued to shoot, taking several frames of the North Tower still standing, amidst the remains of the South.  Then he began documenting the efforts of rescue workers, ignoring the smoking North Tower.

Being that the D30 was a crop sensor body which multiplied the length of the lenses mounted to it, Biggart seems to have primarily used digital for long shots such as the towers themselves and film for closer/wider shots such as people.  He seems to have covered everything before him with all three bodies though, probably using a 50mm and two zoom lenses.  Basically, he shot with everything he had available, in every way he could.

Biggart photographed rescue workers and victims coated in grey brown dust. Yellow reflective stripes of firefighters’ clothing and red emergency lights pierce foggy scenes of disorder.  A well clad man striding through a field of strewn office papers, fractured drywall and miscellaneous pulverized material.  People with ashen faces gasping for air through dirty towels.  Strangers helping strangers.  Arms around shoulders.  Coughing.  Crying.

Most of Biggarts shots were, of course, thoughtfully composed and carefully timed.  Others, I’d argue, appear to be made more frantically, yielding evidence that even this hard-nosed, road-worn news vet had been shaken.

Then Biggart’s flip-phone rang.  It was his wife, Wendy.  “I’m safe, I’m with the firemen.”  he comforted her.  Bill said that he would meet Wendy at his studio in about twenty minutes.  At this point, we can speculate that Biggart concluded that the height of the action was over and that he needed to process his film and dump his cards in prep for immediate media release of the images.

But the twenty minutes in which Biggart planned to meet his wife passed.

And he was still shooting.

Biggart seems to have been in search of the hero shot to wrap with.  The intrepid photographer began snapping some wide shots of the demolished South Tower, presumably with his back towards the North Tower.

Bolivar Arellano, a shooter for the New York Post who was also covering the terrible event, witnessed colleague Bill Biggart on the scene.  Arellano stated that Biggart was closer to the towers than any other photographer, and in fact, closer than many firefighters.

Bill Biggart was vocal about his love for New York City.  He often commented that it was the greatest city on earth.  And his commitment to the city was evident with every shutter cycle that Tuesday morning.

At 10:28:22 am, the weakened support finally gave out beneath the impact zone of the North Tower, and the massive structure began imploding.

At 10:28:24 Bill Biggart took a beautiful photo of the ruins of the South Tower and the still-standing base of the North Tower.  The scene was a tapestry of repetitive industrial lines fractured and softened by dust and smoke.  The image is near colorless and muted, solemn and grim as the day.

Bill was probably still looking through the viewfinder of his Canon D30 when 500,000 tons of glass, concrete and steel suddenly came crashing down on him at 120 miles per hour.

Wendy waited at the studio.  And waited.  She spent desperate but hopeful days searching overwhelmed hospitals for her husband.  Fellow photographers shared their accounts of where they last saw Biggart.

Four days after the tragedy, rescue crews were finally able to remove Biggart’s body from beneath the dense rubble that once comprised the World Trade Center.  Biggart was the only pro photog who covered 9/11 and did not make it out alive.  But his images were possibly the most personal.

img_1056
©2002 Johnny Martyr, please contact JohnnyMartyr@Hotmail.com for use
img_1055

©2002 Johnny Martyr, please contact JohnnyMartyr@Hotmail.com for use

A friend and colleague, photographer Chip East was tasked with recovering any images from Biggart’s belongings.  The lens elements had been sheared off or blasted out of all three Canon bodies.  The film compartment doors had been ripped off both EOS-1n film bodies, exposing the last two complete rolls within them to bare light and erasing Biggart’s last film shots.  The metal cassettes holding the other four rolls of film had been badly deformed which also admitted light, scarring many images with light leaks.  Of the approximate 144 possible film images Biggart may have taken, only a handful survived.  The compact flash card within the D30, however was cradled safely inside the camera’s magnesium alloy body.  When Chip East first inserted the card into his reader, nothing happened.  He rebooted his computer and miraculously, the card fired up and yielded its precious contents; 154 complete files, with accurate timestamps.

Biggart’s final photograph, the taken at 10:28:24 capturing the remains of the South Tower was featured in countless publications and exhibited at the International Center of Photography in New York City, then at the National Museum of American History in 2002.  Bill Biggart’s equipment and belongings were also on display there and in 2008 at the Newseum in Washington DC.

Biggart’s 35mm film images are mostly damaged by light and heat.  They are discolored and feature large, chaotic blotches, which, themselves are physical imprints of the destruction of the Twin Towers.  Today, the film images exist as a kind of forensic artwork, expressing an incredibly unique and meaningful account of the disaster.

As a young photography student, I was fortunate enough to catch a glimpse of Bill Biggart’s work and personal effects during one of his posthumous exhibits.  I took my photos on Kodak bw400cn with my Pentax K1000 and 40-80mm lens.  I recently dug those photos out of my archive for this article on the anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

I will never forget.

You can see Bill’s photos of 9/11 and his b&w 35mm photo essays at www.BillBiggart.com

Follow, Favorite, Like, Add, Insult, Contact Johnny Martyr 

     

6 thoughts on “The Final Moments of 9/11 Photographer, Bill Biggart

  1. i wasn’t aware of your blog last year, so reading this today was a first. your words evoked supreme sadness … by the end, i was awash in emotion yet again for that tragic day and the individuals who lost everything.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Wow, that’s a powerful story, I had never heard of Biggart before. Wherever there is an important event there will be a photographer ready to risk his/her life to capture it. I’m grateful to him to for the images he was able to give us, though it’s tragic and ironic that if he had been more mindful of his own life we could have had even more.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think it was just so unfathomable by Biggart and many folks that the towers could fall that the implosions were not even considered. Sure, firefighters established a perimeter to keep people at a safe distance, but that perimeter was massively breached by debris during each tower fall. And people were certainly injured and killed who were well beyond the perimeter. I don’t know that criticisms of Biggart’s mindfulness or caution are really appropriate without taking into context the confusion and lack of understanding about what was really happening. It’s also possible that he was unable to exit after the first tower fell and maybe I should have alluded to that. I wanted to stick to verifiable facts and not speculate but I fear that my interpretation of the puzzle pieces of his story might lead some to see him as having been irresponsible. That is far from my belief or goal though. In fact, I find it amazing that more photojournalists’ lives were not lost when viewing their images. I understand that you meant no disrespect in pointing this out but just wanted to address the point! Thanks for reading and commenting, Joe!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s